SGU Episode 899
This transcript is not finished. Please help us finish it! Add a Transcribing template to the top of this transcript before you start so that we don't duplicate your efforts. |
Template:Editing required (w/links) You can use this outline to help structure the transcription. Click "Edit" above to begin.
SGU Episode 899 |
---|
October 1st 2022 |
Skeptical Rogues |
S: Steven Novella |
B: Bob Novella |
C: Cara Santa Maria |
J: Jay Novella |
E: Evan Bernstein |
Guest |
TD: Tim Dodd, American science communicator |
Quote of the Week |
This job is a great scientific adventure. |
Fabiola Gianotti, Italian experimental particle physicist |
Links |
Download Podcast |
Show Notes |
Forum Discussion |
Introduction, Hurricane Ian, new SGU Book
Voice-over: You're listening to the Skeptics' Guide to the Universe, your escape to reality.
[00:12.920 --> 00:18.680] Today is Saturday, September 24th, 2022, and this is your host, Stephen Novella.
[00:18.680 --> 00:20.240] Joining me this week are Bob Novella.
[00:20.240 --> 00:21.240] Hey, everybody.
[00:21.240 --> 00:22.240] Kara Santamaria.
[00:22.240 --> 00:23.240] Howdy.
[00:23.240 --> 00:24.240] Jay Novella.
[00:24.240 --> 00:25.240] Hey, guys.
[00:25.240 --> 00:26.240] And Evan Bernstein.
[00:26.240 --> 00:27.240] Good evening, everyone.
[00:27.240 --> 00:31.120] We are recording this episode live in SGU Studios.
[00:31.120 --> 00:37.600] Kara is joining us remotely from Florida, battening down the hatches while a hurricane
[00:37.600 --> 00:39.080] is bearing down on her.
[00:39.080 --> 00:40.240] How are you doing down there, Kara?
[00:40.240 --> 00:45.480] Well, it's not here yet, but I'm supposed to go home to LA next Thursday, and then I
[00:45.480 --> 00:49.400] just found out right after I booked the tickets that we're quite probably going to be hit
[00:49.400 --> 00:52.560] with a category three hurricane on Wednesday.
[00:52.560 --> 00:54.080] It'll be my first ever.
[00:54.080 --> 01:00.880] So I did tornadoes in Texas, earthquakes in California, hurricanes now in Florida.
[01:00.880 --> 01:02.680] Just need to move on to an active volcano.
[01:02.680 --> 01:03.680] Yeah, there you go.
[01:03.680 --> 01:07.960] Now, Kara, you know according to Florida rules, you need to be mowing your lawn when that
[01:07.960 --> 01:10.000] hurricane hits, right?
[01:10.000 --> 01:14.160] You need to be outside doing something as if there's no danger.
[01:14.160 --> 01:16.560] Right, and my cow needs to be untrimmed.
[01:16.560 --> 01:17.560] Right.
[01:17.560 --> 01:21.440] Because the low pressure of the system raises the grass a little straighter, makes it easier
[01:21.440 --> 01:22.440] to cut.
[01:22.440 --> 01:23.680] So I mean, it's kind of an obvious move.
[01:23.680 --> 01:28.520] Now, NASA is still planning on launching Artemis on Tuesday.
[01:28.520 --> 01:29.520] Did they finally scrub it?
[01:29.520 --> 01:30.520] That's so not going to happen.
[01:30.520 --> 01:31.520] Oh, yeah.
[01:31.520 --> 01:34.640] Well, they like to wait till the last minute because sometimes these things zig instead
[01:34.640 --> 01:38.560] of zag, and they don't want to miss their window, but I guess the latest update is they
[01:38.560 --> 01:39.560] just scrubbed it.
[01:39.560 --> 01:40.560] Not surprising.
[01:40.560 --> 01:42.280] I thought that was a little bit of wishful thinking.
[01:42.280 --> 01:46.360] So part of the reason why we are recording this episode, and there'll be another episode
[01:46.360 --> 01:51.680] that we're recording as part of a live stream, is because our second book, The Skeptic's
[01:51.680 --> 01:58.440] Guide to the Future, is coming out in just three days on September 27th.
[01:58.440 --> 02:03.060] So this book is The Skeptic's Guide to the Future, but Bob Jay and I wrote this one.
[02:03.060 --> 02:09.560] This was a ton of fun to research, to talk about, to design, figure out what goes into
[02:09.560 --> 02:11.200] it, to write.
[02:11.200 --> 02:13.560] We've already had a few interviews about it.
[02:13.560 --> 02:16.320] It's super fun to talk about.
[02:16.320 --> 02:22.680] Really what we do in this book is we go through first the history of futurism, right?
[02:22.680 --> 02:28.600] So previous attempts at predicting the future and how did they do, what did they get wrong,
[02:28.600 --> 02:31.160] what patterns of wrongness are there?
[02:31.160 --> 02:36.080] We talk about futurism fallacies, the common mistakes that futurists make over and over
[02:36.080 --> 02:37.080] again.
[02:37.080 --> 02:40.760] We looked a little bit into futurism as an academic discipline to see what they're saying
[02:40.760 --> 02:42.480] there, et cetera.
[02:42.480 --> 02:48.040] And then the meat of the book is we talk about the cutting edge technologies, where they're
[02:48.040 --> 02:53.200] coming from, where they are now, and then we try to extrapolate them into the future,
[02:53.200 --> 02:59.200] the near future, the medium future, and then the distant future when those technologies
[02:59.200 --> 03:00.680] are fully mature.
[03:00.680 --> 03:04.240] What is the ultimate potential of these technologies?
[03:04.240 --> 03:05.320] We had fun.
[03:05.320 --> 03:10.400] That was the fun part because when we discussed what is this technology going to look like
[03:10.400 --> 03:15.960] fifty, a hundred, a thousand years from now, then we took the opportunity to write some
[03:15.960 --> 03:21.360] science fiction to illustrate that technology in use, which I thought came out really well.
[03:21.360 --> 03:27.640] That was a ton of fun discussing what that could look like in use.
[03:27.640 --> 03:28.640] We call them vignettes.
[03:28.640 --> 03:30.720] They're not even really a full short story.
[03:30.720 --> 03:33.400] It's just a glimpse of the future.
[03:33.400 --> 03:38.400] And they bring into lots of different technologies that we had just discussed or that we're about
[03:38.400 --> 03:39.400] to discuss in the book.
[03:39.400 --> 03:42.440] So it's not just one tech, but a bunch of them all in one story.
[03:42.440 --> 03:45.800] And that, of course, is one of the main themes of the book.
[03:45.800 --> 03:50.720] One of the futurism fallacies is to think that how will this one technology look in
[03:50.720 --> 03:51.720] the future?
[03:51.720 --> 03:56.120] But you can't think about it that way because by the time you get to that point that you're
[03:56.120 --> 04:00.720] talking about, all other technologies will have been advancing in the background.
[04:00.720 --> 04:06.260] So I say, well, what will fusion power look like in fifty years?
[04:06.260 --> 04:10.360] You can't talk about that without also talking about what solar power is going to look like
[04:10.360 --> 04:15.160] in fifty years and all other sources of energy because it's always going to be compared to
[04:15.160 --> 04:17.480] all of the other options.
[04:17.480 --> 04:22.880] Or if we talk a lot about space travel and we think, oh, by the time we get, you know,
[04:22.880 --> 04:27.400] here are the problems that we'll be facing with spending a lot of time in space or interstellar
[04:27.400 --> 04:28.400] travel.
[04:28.400 --> 04:31.760] Yeah, but by the time we get that, we might be cyborgs.
[04:31.760 --> 04:32.760] We probably will be.
[04:32.760 --> 04:34.340] We'll be genetically engineered.
[04:34.340 --> 04:38.280] We may just, you know, transfer into a robot for the trip, you know, or whatever.
[04:38.280 --> 04:40.680] Like you have to think about all the other things that are happening.
[04:40.680 --> 04:41.680] It's not going to be us.
[04:41.680 --> 04:42.680] Right.
[04:42.680 --> 04:43.680] Right.
[04:43.680 --> 04:44.680] It's not going to be us in the future.
[04:44.680 --> 04:45.680] That's what we want.
[04:45.680 --> 04:46.680] We want to imagine us in the future.
[04:46.680 --> 04:47.680] But that's not what's going to be happening.
[04:47.680 --> 04:52.200] And if you look at previous predictions of the future and futurists, that's a classic
[04:52.200 --> 04:53.200] mistake.
[04:53.200 --> 04:57.440] They take themselves, their culture, and they just put it, plop it into place with this
[04:57.440 --> 04:58.880] new fancy technology.
[04:58.880 --> 05:01.800] And that's a classic mistake that you see over and over and over.
[05:01.800 --> 05:02.800] Right.
[05:02.800 --> 05:06.400] Because part of, quote unquote, predicting the future is thinking about how people are
[05:06.400 --> 05:08.240] going to interact with that technology.
[05:08.240 --> 05:11.660] And again, we imagine how we're going to interact with that technology.
[05:11.660 --> 05:14.600] But I think we're living at a very interesting time.
[05:14.600 --> 05:21.480] Probably our generation, maybe more than any other generation, has a firsthand example of,
[05:21.480 --> 05:27.040] like for those of us who have kids, like our kids have a different relationship with technology
[05:27.040 --> 05:28.040] than we do.
[05:28.040 --> 05:29.040] Oh my gosh.
[05:29.040 --> 05:30.040] Right.
[05:30.040 --> 05:31.040] They use social media.
[05:31.040 --> 05:32.040] They use their smartphone.
[05:32.040 --> 05:34.280] They think about these things differently than we do.
[05:34.280 --> 05:37.000] They think about it differently.
[05:37.000 --> 05:38.720] They prioritize different things.
[05:38.720 --> 05:43.760] My daughters rarely, if ever, use their phone as a phone.
[05:43.760 --> 05:46.360] It's not really a phone for them.
[05:46.360 --> 05:51.840] They use it way more to text or to communicate on certain social media apps or whatever.
[05:51.840 --> 05:52.840] Wait, Steve.
[05:52.840 --> 05:53.840] Do you use your phone?
[05:53.840 --> 05:54.840] You make phone calls?
[05:54.840 --> 05:55.840] Yes.
[05:55.840 --> 05:56.840] Yeah.
[05:56.840 --> 05:57.840] Yeah.
[05:57.840 --> 05:58.840] What?
[05:58.840 --> 06:02.480] Actually, I was telling Rachel, when I was her age, I had two means of communicating
[06:02.480 --> 06:03.480] with people.
[06:03.480 --> 06:06.520] I wrote them a letter or I picked up a phone and called them.
[06:06.520 --> 06:07.520] And that was it.
[06:07.520 --> 06:08.520] Or you met them in person.
[06:08.520 --> 06:09.520] Yeah.
[06:09.520 --> 06:10.520] That sucked.
[06:10.520 --> 06:11.520] Or you met them in person.
[06:11.520 --> 06:14.440] But short of that, because I moved around the country a lot, I had to want to communicate
[06:14.440 --> 06:15.440] with my friends.
[06:15.440 --> 06:16.680] So we talked about how that happened.
[06:16.680 --> 06:22.360] I said, I wrote letters and made phone calls that cost $15 for 30 minutes.
[06:22.360 --> 06:24.160] That's how you communicated with people across the country.
[06:24.160 --> 06:25.160] That was it.
[06:25.160 --> 06:28.040] And I remember worrying about the cost of making a phone call.
[06:28.040 --> 06:29.040] Absolutely.
[06:29.040 --> 06:32.160] You had to call it off-peak hours so that you wouldn't get charged the prime rate, because
[06:32.160 --> 06:38.080] my parents would kill me if they found out I ran up a $50 phone bill for a call to my
[06:38.080 --> 06:40.040] friend back at the other side of the country.
[06:40.040 --> 06:44.560] I think Steve's a little bit anomalous, though, because I definitely use my phone a lot.
[06:44.560 --> 06:47.560] And I definitely don't use it mostly for making phone calls.
[06:47.560 --> 06:50.800] There's just so much other stuff, the obvious stuff that I do.
[06:50.800 --> 06:51.800] Oh, yeah.
[06:51.800 --> 06:57.240] I mean, a smartphone is probably the phone app is one of the least used aspects of it.
[06:57.240 --> 06:58.240] Absolutely.
[06:58.240 --> 07:00.240] My smartphone is my handheld computer.
[07:00.240 --> 07:01.240] That's not my point.
[07:01.240 --> 07:02.960] If it disappeared, could we get by without it?
[07:02.960 --> 07:04.840] I do call and accept phone calls.
[07:04.840 --> 07:06.160] It is still my phone.
[07:06.160 --> 07:08.480] My daughters, they turned off their ringer.
[07:08.480 --> 07:11.600] They don't use it at all as a phone.
[07:11.600 --> 07:17.440] My phone is on silent with no notifications ever for my mental health, but I'm curious.
[07:17.440 --> 07:21.120] So the only time I ever talk on the phone, and I guess that's changed a little since
[07:21.120 --> 07:26.000] I've been in Florida without a car, but in California, the only time I would have conversations
[07:26.000 --> 07:28.920] was when I was driving long distances.
[07:28.920 --> 07:30.760] Does anybody else have that same vibe?
[07:30.760 --> 07:32.640] The only time I talk to people is in the car.
[07:32.640 --> 07:36.000] That's not the only time, but that's definitely a huge opportunity because you're just sitting
[07:36.000 --> 07:42.480] there doing nothing, and you could talk to people now that it's easy when you route the
[07:42.480 --> 07:44.640] phone through your car so you're not holding it.
[07:44.640 --> 07:47.320] Where are you talking to people, then, if you're not on the phone?
[07:47.320 --> 07:50.320] Are you not having conversations?
[07:50.320 --> 07:54.720] Just communicating virtual time, yeah, with texts and emails and whatever.
[07:54.720 --> 07:57.800] I'm definitely more of a phone talker than a texter.
[07:57.800 --> 08:05.840] And then if I'm missing somebody and we want to have quality time together, then we FaceTime.
[08:05.840 --> 08:11.320] Well I primarily use my phone to get angry at the internet, I think, if I summarize my
[08:11.320 --> 08:12.320] interaction.
[08:12.320 --> 08:14.240] She's an angry old Facebook man.
[08:14.240 --> 08:17.840] I am pissed off at basically everybody that uses social media.
[08:17.840 --> 08:21.600] I log in and I'm instantly furious with what I see.
[08:21.600 --> 08:28.860] But this is a classic sort of futurism fallacy, again, in that past futurists pretty much
[08:28.860 --> 08:36.400] unanimously imagined that in the future, the amorphous future, when the technology existed,
[08:36.400 --> 08:39.720] people will video call, right?
[08:39.720 --> 08:40.840] And now we have...
[08:40.840 --> 08:41.840] We assumed it.
[08:41.840 --> 08:47.560] Even we did years ago, 30 years ago, that was the obvious next step for phones.
[08:47.560 --> 08:56.040] So we have, now we have, you could video call, audio call, or text, and people prefer texting
[08:56.040 --> 08:57.920] to audio and audio to video.
[08:57.920 --> 09:01.360] It's the exact opposite of what everyone predicted prior to...
[09:01.360 --> 09:04.160] Or, I mean, I think they all have different uses.
[09:04.160 --> 09:05.160] But that's the thing.
[09:05.160 --> 09:09.780] Until you put a technology in the hands of billions of people and see how they use it,
[09:09.780 --> 09:12.080] it's hard to predict.
[09:12.080 --> 09:17.320] Most futurists think we're going to use future technology like we use current technology.
[09:17.320 --> 09:19.560] So here's another fun example.
[09:19.560 --> 09:26.480] When commercial airplane travel was first, first becoming a thing, futurists imagined
[09:26.480 --> 09:31.280] that it would evolve into these gigantic luxury airplanes.
[09:31.280 --> 09:32.280] Flying hotels almost.
[09:32.280 --> 09:34.320] They were flying cruise ships, right?
[09:34.320 --> 09:35.620] Right, like luxury liners.
[09:35.620 --> 09:38.360] They were like luxury liners in the air.
[09:38.360 --> 09:45.080] That is how they were imagined because they assumed that the use and priorities, it's
[09:45.080 --> 09:50.600] all about luxury, right, would hold true even to, would translate to this new technology.
[09:50.600 --> 09:54.720] And they didn't anticipate, like, no, people are going to want to get there fast and cheap.
[09:54.720 --> 10:03.320] And now we've gone so far the other direction where we're crammed into these tiny seats.
[10:03.320 --> 10:07.720] And you could pay through the nose for a first class seat where you get a slightly bigger
[10:07.720 --> 10:08.720] seat.
[10:08.720 --> 10:09.720] Makes a difference.
[10:09.720 --> 10:13.840] Or lots of other airlines, lots of other airlines I've seen where you can go super ultra mega
[10:13.840 --> 10:20.760] first class where you literally get a TV this big, a little room, and a foot rub.
[10:20.760 --> 10:24.960] Somebody comes in and gives you a foot rub, but you're spending $40,000.
[10:24.960 --> 10:26.920] How many people are going to really do that?
[10:26.920 --> 10:32.080] And Bob, even that's nothing compared to the luxury liners that they imagined where it
[10:32.080 --> 10:36.080] was like you're living in a hotel while you're on the plane.
[10:36.080 --> 10:37.080] Completely different.
[10:37.080 --> 10:38.080] Yeah.
[10:38.080 --> 10:41.080] Kara, have you ever called the remote control the clicker?
[10:41.080 --> 10:42.080] I have.
[10:42.080 --> 10:43.080] Okay.
[10:43.080 --> 10:44.080] Yeah.
[10:44.080 --> 10:45.080] I have.
[10:45.080 --> 10:46.080] Yeah.
[10:46.080 --> 10:47.080] To the original remote device.
[10:47.080 --> 10:48.080] That's what it was tethered.
[10:48.080 --> 10:49.080] Which made a click noise.
[10:49.080 --> 10:50.080] No, no, no.
[10:50.080 --> 10:51.080] Yeah.
[10:51.080 --> 10:52.080] You would make a literal clicking sound.
[10:52.080 --> 10:53.080] The frequency, right.
[10:53.080 --> 10:57.720] When you hit the button, it would hit a, like, tuning fork rod, which would vibrate at a
[10:57.720 --> 11:01.920] specific frequency, and the TV would respond to that frequency.
[11:01.920 --> 11:03.640] So you had, like, three or four controls.
[11:03.640 --> 11:04.640] Three buttons.
[11:04.640 --> 11:05.640] That's it.
[11:05.640 --> 11:09.240] Yeah, like three or four buttons, like volume, you know, up, down, channel, up, down, on,
[11:09.240 --> 11:10.240] off.
[11:10.240 --> 11:11.240] That's it.
[11:11.240 --> 11:12.240] That's it.
[11:12.240 --> 11:14.560] Yeah, so people still call it the clicker.
[11:14.560 --> 11:15.560] We also still say tape.
[11:15.560 --> 11:17.120] Like, we're going to tape something.
[11:17.120 --> 11:18.120] Right.
[11:18.120 --> 11:19.120] Yeah.
[11:19.120 --> 11:20.120] When tape is nowhere in the loop anymore.
[11:20.120 --> 11:23.480] But they make it, those things, people understand what they mean.
[11:23.480 --> 11:24.480] Yeah.
[11:24.480 --> 11:25.480] Yeah.
[11:25.480 --> 11:26.480] Yeah.
[11:26.480 --> 11:29.800] And, you know, I promise all of you that are young, you'll feel old one day, too.
[11:29.800 --> 11:33.720] Whatever you think is normal now, it won't be in 30 years, and you'll be doing the same
[11:33.720 --> 11:34.720] thing.
[11:34.720 --> 11:35.720] Goddammit.
[11:35.720 --> 11:39.400] And it will probably just speed up.
[11:39.400 --> 11:40.400] Yeah.
[11:40.400 --> 11:41.400] Oh, gosh.
[11:41.400 --> 11:47.680] A 25-year-old and a 20-year and a 20-year-old might find, see dramatic differences as the
[11:47.680 --> 11:53.040] pace of increase, you know, accelerates, as it probably will.
[11:53.040 --> 11:56.960] And we're just skimming the surface of this book.
[11:56.960 --> 12:01.300] The third section of the book goes into science fiction technology.
[12:01.300 --> 12:06.560] So we go beyond actual technology where, like, the roots of it, even if, like, the beginnings
[12:06.560 --> 12:12.340] of it already exist, even if it's just a proof of concept or a theory at this point.
[12:12.340 --> 12:18.560] And then we just talk about crazy sci-fi tech and discuss, like, is this even possible?
[12:18.560 --> 12:20.360] Like lightsabers, you know, things like that.
[12:20.360 --> 12:21.360] Anti-gravity.
[12:21.360 --> 12:25.240] Is it even possible that we could possibly make a lightsaber?
[12:25.240 --> 12:26.440] And what would that be like?
[12:26.440 --> 12:31.240] And can you think about it, like, by the time, if you could make a lightsaber, that technology
[12:31.240 --> 12:33.720] would be useful for so many other things.
[12:33.720 --> 12:35.320] It would be so powerful.
[12:35.320 --> 12:36.320] That power source.
[12:36.320 --> 12:37.320] It would be a game changer.
[12:37.320 --> 12:39.920] I could plug that into my building and run my building off of that.
[12:39.920 --> 12:40.920] Yeah, right.
[12:40.920 --> 12:41.920] Exactly.
[12:41.920 --> 12:47.080] That's like the transporter, you know, like in Star Trek, you know, like, that one invention
[12:47.080 --> 12:48.080] would change reality.
[12:48.080 --> 12:50.680] It would change everybody's life.
[12:50.680 --> 12:53.320] In ways that, you know, would be impossible to predict.
[12:53.320 --> 12:54.320] Yeah.
[12:54.320 --> 12:58.200] Or my favorite, and we go into this in the book, the holodeck.
[12:58.200 --> 13:03.640] If you could do that, why would you confine that to one little room, right?
[13:03.640 --> 13:08.120] Why wouldn't the whole ship be a holodeck, right?
[13:08.120 --> 13:13.480] It would configure itself as needed to whatever functionality you needed anywhere on the ship,
[13:13.480 --> 13:18.240] except, you know, with the only exception of intricate machines that it couldn't make.
[13:18.240 --> 13:20.080] Assuming you had limitless power at your disposal.
[13:20.080 --> 13:22.680] Every room would become a room of requirement.
[13:22.680 --> 13:23.680] Yeah.
[13:23.680 --> 13:24.680] Basically.
[13:24.680 --> 13:25.680] Yeah.
[13:25.680 --> 13:26.680] Pretty much.
[13:26.680 --> 13:30.120] And all you would need is, give me a holodeck and a replicator, and I'm good.
[13:30.120 --> 13:31.120] I'm done.
[13:31.120 --> 13:32.120] Yeah.
[13:32.120 --> 13:33.120] See you.
[13:33.120 --> 13:34.120] See you at that point.
[13:34.120 --> 13:35.120] See you at that point.
[13:35.120 --> 13:39.160] You go into Bob's holodeck, like, 50 years later, and it would be like a Halloween planet.
[13:39.160 --> 13:40.160] Yeah.
[13:40.160 --> 13:41.160] He would have constructed, right?
[13:41.160 --> 13:42.160] Also, don't go in there with a black light.
[13:42.160 --> 13:43.160] Oh, my God.
[13:43.160 --> 13:44.160] I saw the joke, and I took it.
[13:44.160 --> 13:45.160] Yeah.
[13:45.160 --> 13:46.160] Holy shit.
[13:46.160 --> 13:54.800] We encourage anyone who's interested in any of the things we're talking about, anything
[13:54.800 --> 13:59.400] about futurism and future technology and existing technology and the history of technology,
[13:59.400 --> 14:04.200] all of that, and sci-fi stuff, to pre-order the book, The Skeptic's Guide to the Future.
[14:04.200 --> 14:09.320] If you're listening to this after September 27th, you can order the book directly, and
[14:09.320 --> 14:11.800] they'll send it to you.
[14:11.800 --> 14:15.480] You can get to the links on the SGU page.
[14:15.480 --> 14:19.960] You go to the, you know, slash books, and then that takes you to the publisher who has
[14:19.960 --> 14:23.040] all the actual links to specific sellers.
[14:23.040 --> 14:27.880] I also will remind you that this is our second book.
[14:27.880 --> 14:29.840] Don't forget about The Skeptic's Guide to the Universe.
[14:29.840 --> 14:30.840] That's our first book.
[14:30.840 --> 14:32.640] It's still selling quite well, actually.
[14:32.640 --> 14:33.640] Yeah.
[14:33.640 --> 14:35.840] Let's get to some actual content.
[14:35.840 --> 14:36.840] Bob.
[14:36.840 --> 14:37.840] Oh, boy.
Forgotten Superheroes of Science (14:37)
- Raye Jean Montague, American naval engineer credited with creating the first computer-generated rough draft of a U.S. naval ship
[14:37.840 --> 14:38.840] You're going to do a Forgotten Superhero of Science.
[14:38.840 --> 14:39.840] Yeah.
[14:39.840 --> 14:40.840] I haven't done this in a while.
[14:40.840 --> 14:42.940] So, yes, Forgotten Superheroes of Science.
[14:42.940 --> 14:51.680] This is Ray Jean Montague, 1935 to 2018, naval engineer and the first female program manager
[14:51.680 --> 14:54.120] of ships in the United States Navy.
[14:54.120 --> 14:59.160] In her own words, she said, I'm known as the first person to design a ship using the computer.
[14:59.160 --> 15:00.160] Cool.
[15:00.160 --> 15:04.920] Montague was inspired early in life when, for her, you know, her scientific career.
[15:04.920 --> 15:09.480] When she was seven, I believe in 1940, her grandfather took her on a tour of a captured
[15:09.480 --> 15:10.480] German sub.
[15:10.480 --> 15:11.480] Wow.
[15:11.480 --> 15:15.560] And she said, she's quoted as saying about that experience, I looked through the periscope
[15:15.560 --> 15:17.840] and saw all these dials and mechanisms.
[15:17.840 --> 15:23.080] And I said to the guy who was giving the tour, what do you have to know to do this?
[15:23.080 --> 15:26.020] And he replied, oh, you'd have to be an engineer.
[15:26.020 --> 15:28.040] You don't have to worry about that.
[15:28.040 --> 15:32.840] And the implication, of course, a young black girl, you know, is never going to become an
[15:32.840 --> 15:33.840] engineer.
[15:33.840 --> 15:35.680] And don't forget, and also this was like in the 1940s.
[15:35.680 --> 15:40.400] So imagine, you know, the attitudes then for somebody like that becoming an engineer.
[15:40.400 --> 15:43.080] I mean, it's almost unimaginable how bad it was.
[15:43.080 --> 15:44.440] You know, today it's not great.
[15:44.440 --> 15:45.800] Back then, oof.
[15:45.800 --> 15:51.840] But Montague joined the United States Navy in 1955 in Washington, D.C.
[15:51.840 --> 15:53.560] And she was a clerk typist.
[15:53.560 --> 15:57.280] And she was sitting right next to the Univac One.
[15:57.280 --> 15:58.280] Univac One.
[15:58.280 --> 15:59.280] Univac.
[15:59.280 --> 16:00.280] Yeah.
[16:00.280 --> 16:04.520] So if you remember, the ENIAC was the first programmable, electronic, general purpose
[16:04.520 --> 16:06.080] digital computer.
[16:06.080 --> 16:09.440] There were other computers at that time that had some of those capabilities.
[16:09.440 --> 16:13.720] But that was the first one to have pretty much all of that at the same time.
[16:13.720 --> 16:16.220] And it was completed in 1945.
[16:16.220 --> 16:19.360] And it was used for the United States Army's Ballistic Research Lab.
[16:19.360 --> 16:22.480] Of course, it was an amazing tool.
[16:22.480 --> 16:24.600] Of course, it was, you know, it was a computer.
[16:24.600 --> 16:29.520] Univac One was essentially the business version of the ENIAC.
[16:29.520 --> 16:30.840] That's basically what that was.
[16:30.840 --> 16:35.240] It was the very first successful civilian computer.
[16:35.240 --> 16:39.720] And it was obviously, that was a critical piece of the dawn of the computer age.
[16:39.720 --> 16:43.720] I mean, it's a milestone of milestones right there.
[16:43.720 --> 16:45.520] And she was sitting right next to it.
[16:45.520 --> 16:46.840] She was working next to it.
[16:46.840 --> 16:50.920] And the story goes that one day, a lot, all of the engineers called in sick for whatever
[16:50.920 --> 16:51.920] reason.
[16:51.920 --> 16:53.300] I don't know if they were really partying the night before.
[16:53.300 --> 16:54.360] But none of them came in.
[16:54.360 --> 17:00.360] And she was able to dive right in and accomplish some work on the Univac One because she had
[17:00.360 --> 17:04.720] seen and she had observed the engineers using it for quite a while.
[17:04.720 --> 17:08.160] Soon after that, she was studying computer programming at night school.
[17:08.160 --> 17:11.920] And then the promotions seemed to come very, very quickly for her.
[17:11.920 --> 17:17.520] She was appointed as a computer systems analyst at the Navy Ship Engineering Center.
[17:17.520 --> 17:22.280] And then program director for the Naval Sea Systems Command Integrated Design Manufacturing
[17:22.280 --> 17:24.240] and Maintenance Program.
[17:24.240 --> 17:30.680] And then division head for the Computer Aided Design and Computer Aided Manufacturing, CAD,
[17:30.680 --> 17:37.120] CAD-CAM program, and deputy program manager of the Navy's Information Systems Improvement
[17:37.120 --> 17:38.120] Program.
[17:38.120 --> 17:40.600] So lots of titles, lots of responsibilities.
[17:40.600 --> 17:47.920] And then back in 1971, her department was challenged with a task to create a computer
[17:47.920 --> 17:52.240] generated ship design, had never really been done before.
[17:52.240 --> 17:56.640] She pulled together a lot of systems, some automated systems that had been created, pulled
[17:56.640 --> 17:57.640] them together.
[17:57.640 --> 18:06.000] And within 19 hours, she had an initial draft for an Oliver Hazard Perry class frigate.
[18:06.000 --> 18:08.960] Perry class frigate, I like the sound of that.
[18:08.960 --> 18:15.200] Within 19 hours, that made her the first person to design a ship using a computer system.
[18:15.200 --> 18:21.280] And then after that, she worked on Sea Wolf class submarines, Nimitz class aircraft carriers,
[18:21.280 --> 18:22.560] and Dwight D. Azenhower.
[18:22.560 --> 18:28.560] And just amazing to think she started as a clerk typist, and she ultimately was doing
[18:28.560 --> 18:31.720] amazing things and breaking ground.
[18:31.720 --> 18:32.720] And being the first.
[18:32.720 --> 18:33.720] What a life.
[18:33.720 --> 18:34.720] Incredible.
[18:34.720 --> 18:36.120] Being involved in all those different things, that is fantastic.
[18:36.120 --> 18:37.120] Amazing.
[18:37.120 --> 18:43.880] And also, you can imagine the pushback she got being a black woman at that time.
[18:43.880 --> 18:46.040] So I'm sure that wasn't easy as well.
[18:46.040 --> 18:51.720] Well, it's a testament to just how unbelievably talented and intelligent she was.
[18:51.720 --> 18:54.400] She had to blow people's minds in order to get there.
[18:54.400 --> 18:55.400] Absolutely.
[18:55.400 --> 19:00.480] And that's a common thread in a lot of these superhero segments that I've done, where they
[19:00.480 --> 19:06.040] were so superior that it couldn't be denied in a lot of cases.
[19:06.040 --> 19:10.720] And that's unfortunate that you have to be so amazing just to get the same opportunities
[19:10.720 --> 19:13.520] that people who are average amazing have.
[19:13.520 --> 19:14.840] All right.
[19:14.840 --> 19:20.760] So remember, the United States Navy's hidden figure, Ray Jean Montague.
[19:20.760 --> 19:24.600] Mention her to your friends, or Jay, mention her to your friend, especially when you're
[19:24.600 --> 19:25.600] discussing-
[19:25.600 --> 19:26.600] You're just Bob.
[19:26.600 --> 19:27.600] It's just me.
[19:27.600 --> 19:29.440] It's just Bob.
[19:29.440 --> 19:35.120] Especially when discussing drawing interchange formats, cattle bar arrangements, or especially
[19:35.120 --> 19:36.640] geometric modeling kernels.
[19:36.640 --> 19:37.640] Ooh, I like those.
[19:37.640 --> 19:38.640] Yes.
[19:38.640 --> 19:39.640] Thank you.
News Items
S:
B:
C:
J:
E:
(laughs) (laughter) (applause) [inaudible]
Are Fake Meats Sustainable? (19:39)
Why Go Back to the Moon? (38:08)
Interview with The Everyday Astronaut (53:10)
Science or Fiction (1:24:55)
Theme: Past inventions that utterly failed
Item #1: In 1983, in response to the Sony Walkman craze, Audio Technica released the Sound Burger, a portable record player, complete with earbuds.[4]
Item #2: In 1981 a Swedish company marketed an all-plastic bicycle, the Itera, which turned out to be expensive to produce but failed mostly because the weak frame made it too wobbly to ride.[5]
Item #3: In the 1930s architect Buckminster Fuller designed a pre-fab house designed to be inexpensive, quick to build, and ecofriendly, made mostly out of waste cow bones from the beef industry.[6]
Item #4: In 1964, Claus Scholz of Vienna invented a phone-answering robot; however, its ability was limited to picking up and hanging up the phone.[7][8]
Answer | Item |
---|---|
Fiction | Cow bones pre fab house |
Science | Portable record player |
Science | All-plastic bicycle |
Science | Phone-answering robot |
Host | Result |
---|---|
Steve | win |
Rogue | Guess |
---|---|
Evan | All-plastic bicycle |
Bob | Portable record player |
Jay | Cow bones pre fab house |
Cara | Cow bones pre fab house |
Voice-over: It's time for Science or Fiction.
Evan's Response
Bob's Response
Jay's Response
Cara's Response
Viewers' Responses
Steve Explains Item #4
Steve Explains Item #1
Steve Explains Item #2
Steve Explains Item #3
Skeptical Quote of the Week (1:40:32)
This job is a great scientific adventure. But it's also a great human adventure. Mankind has made giant steps forward. However, what we know is really very, very little compared to what we still have to know.
– Fabiola Gianotti, Italian experimental particle physicist
Signoff/Announcements
S: —and until next week, this is your Skeptics' Guide to the Universe.
S: Skeptics' Guide to the Universe is produced by SGU Productions, dedicated to promoting science and critical thinking. For more information, visit us at theskepticsguide.org. Send your questions to info@theskepticsguide.org. And, if you would like to support the show and all the work that we do, go to patreon.com/SkepticsGuide and consider becoming a patron and becoming part of the SGU community. Our listeners and supporters are what make SGU possible.
Today I Learned
- Fact/Description, possibly with an article reference[9]
- Fact/Description
- Fact/Description
Notes
References
- ↑ Popular Mechanics: NASA's Nuclear Thermal Engine Is a Blast From the Cold War Past
- ↑ Ars Technica: How sustainable are fake meats?
- ↑ Phys.org: Why go back to the Moon?
- ↑ Museum of Failure: Sound Burger – portable vinyl player
- ↑ Museum of Failure: Itera – the plastic bicycle
- ↑ Wikipedia: Dymaxion house
- ↑ British Pathé: Austria: Inventor Shows Robot "Servants"
- ↑ Cybernetic Zoo: 1957-73 – "MM6", "MM7 SELEKTOR" & "MM8 CONTINA" SELEKTOR – CLAUS SCHOLZ (AUSTRIAN)
- ↑ [url_for_TIL publication: title]
Vocabulary