Talk:SGU Episode 3: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(comments on subdividing interview) |
(Response about links) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Any opinions? | Any opinions? | ||
[[User:Bshirley|Bshirley]] ([[User talk:Bshirley|talk]]) 00:30, 28 November 2012 (UTC) | [[User:Bshirley|Bshirley]] ([[User talk:Bshirley|talk]]) 00:30, 28 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
:Thanks for doing the proof-reading for this episode, and welcome, Bshirley! We don't really have an authoritative guide for what should be linked, what site to link to, etc. Someone had once suggested using "nofollow" for links to pseudoscience sites, but I think the MediaWiki software doesn't support that. The Wiki link for Discovery should be just as good.<br/>-- [[User:Av8rmike|Av8rmike]] ([[User talk:Av8rmike|talk]]) 05:14, 28 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
I subdivided the interview into the salient discussions they had. Seems like a good idea. Of course, after listening to it, I didn't have the time references easily accessible to me. | I subdivided the interview into the salient discussions they had. Seems like a good idea. Of course, after listening to it, I didn't have the time references easily accessible to me. | ||
[[User:Bshirley|Bshirley]] ([[User talk:Bshirley|talk]]) 03:03, 28 November 2012 (UTC) | [[User:Bshirley|Bshirley]] ([[User talk:Bshirley|talk]]) 03:03, 28 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:14, 28 November 2012
It's my opinion that think link in the page to the Discovery Institute should be to Wikipedia and not to the institute's web site itself. Perhaps that link should be at the bottom of the page or section? I am going to change it.
from http://www.discovery.org/ to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discovery_Institute
Any opinions? Bshirley (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for doing the proof-reading for this episode, and welcome, Bshirley! We don't really have an authoritative guide for what should be linked, what site to link to, etc. Someone had once suggested using "nofollow" for links to pseudoscience sites, but I think the MediaWiki software doesn't support that. The Wiki link for Discovery should be just as good.
-- Av8rmike (talk) 05:14, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
I subdivided the interview into the salient discussions they had. Seems like a good idea. Of course, after listening to it, I didn't have the time references easily accessible to me. Bshirley (talk) 03:03, 28 November 2012 (UTC)