SGU Episode 344: Difference between revisions
(fix qow) |
m (had incorrect outro) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
* http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-17014808 | * http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-17014808 | ||
== Quickie with Bob: Alien matter in the solar system <small>()</small> == | |||
* Alien matter in the solar system: A galactic mismatch http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-02-alien-solar-galactic-mismatch.html | * Alien matter in the solar system: A galactic mismatch http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-02-alien-solar-galactic-mismatch.html | ||
== Who's That Noisy <small>()</small> == | == Who's That Noisy <small>()</small> == | ||
* Answer to last week: Kabala | * Answer to last week: Kabala | ||
== Questions and Emails <small>()</small> == | == Questions and Emails <small>()</small> == | ||
=== Question #1 - Can Evolution be Falsified <small>()</small> === | === Question #1 - Can Evolution be Falsified <small>()</small> === | ||
<blockquote>Thanks so much for the show. My old Grandad raised an interesting question recently: can evolution be falsified? My initial reaction was 'of course it can', but it turned out that no matter how hard I thought about it, I couldn't come up with a way in which it could. So I turned to the web, and the best and only possible falsification (that I could understand) I could find is this: the discovery of a complete human fossil that is 3 billion years old (you can substitute the specifics but you get the idea). What are your thoughts? If evolution can't be falsified should it be discounted, or at least somehow relegated as a scientific theory? I think not, but I struggle to find an answer to those that stipulate that science must be falsifiable. Later. paul wild UK</blockquote> | <blockquote>Thanks so much for the show. My old Grandad raised an interesting question recently: can evolution be falsified? My initial reaction was 'of course it can', but it turned out that no matter how hard I thought about it, I couldn't come up with a way in which it could. So I turned to the web, and the best and only possible falsification (that I could understand) I could find is this: the discovery of a complete human fossil that is 3 billion years old (you can substitute the specifics but you get the idea). What are your thoughts? If evolution can't be falsified should it be discounted, or at least somehow relegated as a scientific theory? I think not, but I struggle to find an answer to those that stipulate that science must be falsifiable. Later. paul wild UK</blockquote> | ||
| Line 63: | Line 64: | ||
<blockquote>'It is a truly wonderful fact -- the wonder of which we are apt to overlook from familiarity -- that all animals and all plants throughout all time and space should be related to each other in group subordinate to group' - Charles Darwin</blockquote> | <blockquote>'It is a truly wonderful fact -- the wonder of which we are apt to overlook from familiarity -- that all animals and all plants throughout all time and space should be related to each other in group subordinate to group' - Charles Darwin</blockquote> | ||
{{ | {{Outro301}} | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
{{Navigation}} <!-- inserts images that link to the previous and next episode pages --> | {{Navigation}} <!-- inserts images that link to the previous and next episode pages --> | ||
Latest revision as of 05:10, 1 May 2021
|
This episode needs: transcription, time stamps, formatting, links, 'Today I Learned' list, categories, segment redirects. Please help out by contributing! |
How to Contribute |
| SGU Episode 344 |
|---|
| February 18th 2012 |
 |
| (brief caption for the episode icon) |
| Skeptical Rogues |
| S: Steven Novella |
B: Bob Novella |
R: Rebecca Watson |
J: Jay Novella |
E: Evan Bernstein |
| Quote of the Week |
'It is a truly wonderful fact - the wonder of which we are apt to overlook from familiarity -- that all animals and all plants throughout all time and space should be related to each other in group subordinate to group' |
| Links |
| Download Podcast |
| Show Notes |
| Forum Discussion |
Introduction[edit]
You're listening to the Skeptics' Guide to the Universe, your escape to reality.
This Day in Skepticism ()[edit]
- February 18, 1930: The Discovery of Pluto
News Items ()[edit]
The Science of Pony Tails ()[edit]
Online Surveys ()[edit]
Structural Batteries ()[edit]
Quickie with Bob: Alien matter in the solar system ()[edit]
- Alien matter in the solar system: A galactic mismatch http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-02-alien-solar-galactic-mismatch.html
Who's That Noisy ()[edit]
- Answer to last week: Kabala
Questions and Emails ()[edit]
Question #1 - Can Evolution be Falsified ()[edit]
Thanks so much for the show. My old Grandad raised an interesting question recently: can evolution be falsified? My initial reaction was 'of course it can', but it turned out that no matter how hard I thought about it, I couldn't come up with a way in which it could. So I turned to the web, and the best and only possible falsification (that I could understand) I could find is this: the discovery of a complete human fossil that is 3 billion years old (you can substitute the specifics but you get the idea). What are your thoughts? If evolution can't be falsified should it be discounted, or at least somehow relegated as a scientific theory? I think not, but I struggle to find an answer to those that stipulate that science must be falsifiable. Later. paul wild UK
Question #2 - Headgear ()[edit]
My 13 year old daughter is being required to wear headgear to prevent concussion during soccer games and practices. I have researched extensively on pubmed but cannot find much support that these headbands will prevent concussion. What I have so far: 1. females are more likely to get concussions than males 2. properly heading the ball does not cause concussion 3. colliding with a person or goal post will give you a concussion 4. pro soccer players will show some damage to their heads http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2582549/ http://ajs.sagepub.com/content/30/2/157.abstract http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9548117?dopt=Abstract http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17615173 I am being told to buy this headgear 'just to be on the safe side' but I object to doing things for no clear benefit. Can you advise on whether the data supports purchase of soccer headgear for a 13-year old female to wear during play and practices? Many thanks for any help. Everyone is either laughing at me or acting as if I do not want my kid to be safe. I do want her safe. But not in a padded cell, kwim? Joanna Wijntjes Menlo Park, CA
Science or Fiction ()[edit]
Item #1: Programmers have created a computer program that can score 150 on a standard IQ test. Item #2: Programmers have developed software that can monitor video chat in real time and accurately detect deception and other emotions in the target. Item #3: Forensic scientists have developed a system for identifying unknown skulls by computer comparison to pictures of living people.
Skeptical Quote of the Week ()[edit]
'It is a truly wonderful fact -- the wonder of which we are apt to overlook from familiarity -- that all animals and all plants throughout all time and space should be related to each other in group subordinate to group' - Charles Darwin
Voice-over: The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe is produced by SGU Productions, dedicated to promoting science and critical thinking. For more information on this and other episodes, please visit our website at www.theskepticsguide.org. You can also check out our other podcast, The SGU 5x5, as well as find links to our blogs and the SGU forums. For questions, suggestions, and other feedback, please use the "Contact Us" form on the website or send an email to info@theskepticsguide.org. If you enjoyed this episode, then please help us spread the word by leaving us a review on iTunes, Zune, or your portal of choice.
References[edit]
|
|
|