SGU Episode 400 - Revision history

Xanderox: updating outro1 to 301

2020-04-27T02:06:53Z

updating outro1 to 301

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:06, 27 April 2020
Line 555:		Line 555:
	=== Rich Binder's Artwork <small>(1:13:05)</small> ===		=== Rich Binder's Artwork <small>(1:13:05)</small> ===

	{{~~Outro1~~}}		{{Outro301}}

	== References ==		== References ==

Teleuteskitty: formatted QWB header

2013-09-06T19:45:47Z

formatted QWB header

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:45, 6 September 2013
Line 492:		Line 492:
	S: Yeah, but Jay, I agree with you, but there are different flavors. And you're talking about one flavor of people who don't get it right, of pseudoscientists, the true believer, if you will. I'm talking about scientists who are just not skeptics. So these guys are not aware. They haven't made a career examining ESP research. And finding out why proponents of ESP, for example, think that they have found evidence of extra-sensory perception when they haven't. And examining all the subtle ways in which they manipulate the data and their analysis and why they fail. Where they twist their logic. So these guys are falling into the skeptical traps because they're not skeptics. They don't understand the principles of science-based medicine. They're just, they're naïve. They're frankly naïve about that degree of problems, you know, the subtle problems that creep in. It's interesting the different flavors of cranks and pseudo-scientists and just legitimate scientists who get it wrong sometimes. You know, the ways in which that happens. That's what we study. That's what we are, in fact, experts in. So it was interesting that he sort of criticized all the things that are actually the reasons for why they completely failed. This might have been a good dialog. I might have learned something out of this exchange. But it's an opportunity for us to explain their failure at least, and that is a teaching moment, I guess.		S: Yeah, but Jay, I agree with you, but there are different flavors. And you're talking about one flavor of people who don't get it right, of pseudoscientists, the true believer, if you will. I'm talking about scientists who are just not skeptics. So these guys are not aware. They haven't made a career examining ESP research. And finding out why proponents of ESP, for example, think that they have found evidence of extra-sensory perception when they haven't. And examining all the subtle ways in which they manipulate the data and their analysis and why they fail. Where they twist their logic. So these guys are falling into the skeptical traps because they're not skeptics. They don't understand the principles of science-based medicine. They're just, they're naïve. They're frankly naïve about that degree of problems, you know, the subtle problems that creep in. It's interesting the different flavors of cranks and pseudo-scientists and just legitimate scientists who get it wrong sometimes. You know, the ways in which that happens. That's what we study. That's what we are, in fact, experts in. So it was interesting that he sort of criticized all the things that are actually the reasons for why they completely failed. This might have been a good dialog. I might have learned something out of this exchange. But it's an opportunity for us to explain their failure at least, and that is a teaching moment, I guess.

	== Quickie With Bob <small>(44:14)</small> ==		== Quickie With Bob: The closest solar system <small>(44:14)</small> ==

	J: I would like a Quickie With Bob.		J: I would like a Quickie With Bob.

Banjopine at 23:58, 8 August 2013

2013-08-08T23:58:57Z

@@ Line 493: / Line 493: @@
 == Quickie With Bob <small>(44:14)</small> ==
-* Astronomer discovers closest star system to our sun
 == News Items Continued==

Teleuteskitty: "quicky" -> "quickie"

2013-08-03T20:09:38Z

"quicky" -> "quickie"

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:09, 3 August 2013
Line 492:		Line 492:
	S: Yeah, but Jay, I agree with you, but there are different flavors. And you're talking about one flavor of people who don't get it right, of pseudoscientists, the true believer, if you will. I'm talking about scientists who are just not skeptics. So these guys are not aware. They haven't made a career examining ESP research. And finding out why proponents of ESP, for example, think that they have found evidence of extra-sensory perception when they haven't. And examining all the subtle ways in which they manipulate the data and their analysis and why they fail. Where they twist their logic. So these guys are falling into the skeptical traps because they're not skeptics. They don't understand the principles of science-based medicine. They're just, they're naïve. They're frankly naïve about that degree of problems, you know, the subtle problems that creep in. It's interesting the different flavors of cranks and pseudo-scientists and just legitimate scientists who get it wrong sometimes. You know, the ways in which that happens. That's what we study. That's what we are, in fact, experts in. So it was interesting that he sort of criticized all the things that are actually the reasons for why they completely failed. This might have been a good dialog. I might have learned something out of this exchange. But it's an opportunity for us to explain their failure at least, and that is a teaching moment, I guess.		S: Yeah, but Jay, I agree with you, but there are different flavors. And you're talking about one flavor of people who don't get it right, of pseudoscientists, the true believer, if you will. I'm talking about scientists who are just not skeptics. So these guys are not aware. They haven't made a career examining ESP research. And finding out why proponents of ESP, for example, think that they have found evidence of extra-sensory perception when they haven't. And examining all the subtle ways in which they manipulate the data and their analysis and why they fail. Where they twist their logic. So these guys are falling into the skeptical traps because they're not skeptics. They don't understand the principles of science-based medicine. They're just, they're naïve. They're frankly naïve about that degree of problems, you know, the subtle problems that creep in. It's interesting the different flavors of cranks and pseudo-scientists and just legitimate scientists who get it wrong sometimes. You know, the ways in which that happens. That's what we study. That's what we are, in fact, experts in. So it was interesting that he sort of criticized all the things that are actually the reasons for why they completely failed. This might have been a good dialog. I might have learned something out of this exchange. But it's an opportunity for us to explain their failure at least, and that is a teaching moment, I guess.

	== ~~Quicky~~ With Bob <small>(44:14)</small> ==		== Quickie With Bob <small>(44:14)</small> ==
	* Astronomer discovers closest star system to our sun		* Astronomer discovers closest star system to our sun

Banjopine at 04:05, 27 July 2013

2013-07-27T04:05:15Z

Show changes

Av8rmike: Has timestamps

2013-07-26T03:55:55Z

Has timestamps

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:55, 26 July 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:
	\|transcription = y		\|transcription = y
	<!-- \|proof-reading = y please remove commenting mark-up when some transcription is present -->		<!-- \|proof-reading = y please remove commenting mark-up when some transcription is present -->
	~~\|time-stamps = y~~
	\|Today I Learned list = y		\|Today I Learned list = y
	\|categories = y		\|categories = y
Line 412:		Line 411:
	* April 5th-7th 2013		* April 5th-7th 2013

	=== Rich Binder's Artwork <small>1:13:05</small> ===		=== Rich Binder's Artwork <small>(1:13:05)</small> ===

	{{Outro1}}		{{Outro1}}

Av8rmike: Remove notes link, use episode number, clean up info box

2013-07-26T03:51:29Z

Remove notes link, use episode number, clean up info box

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:51, 26 July 2013
Line 8:		Line 8:
	\|}}		\|}}
	{{InfoBox		{{InfoBox
	\|~~episodeTitle~~ = ~~SGU Episode~~ 400		\|episodeNum = 400
	\|episodeDate = 16<sup>th</sup> March 2012 ~~<!-- broadcast date -->~~		\|episodeDate = 16<sup>th</sup> March 2012
	\|episodeIcon = File:Fossil_diatome.jpg ~~<!-- use "File:" and file name for image on show notes page-->~~		\|episodeIcon = File:Fossil_diatome.jpg
	~~\|previous = <!-- not required, automates to previous episode -->~~		\|rebecca = y
	~~\|next = <!-- not required, automates to next episode -->~~		\|bob = y
	\|rebecca = y ~~<!-- leave blank if absent -->~~		\|jay = y
	\|bob = y ~~<!-- leave blank if absent -->~~		\|evan = y
	\|jay = y ~~<!-- leave blank if absent -->~~
	\|evan = y ~~<!-- leave blank if absent -->~~
	~~\|perry = <!-- leave blank if absent -->~~
	~~\|guest1 = <!-- leave blank if no guest -->~~
	~~\|guest2 = <!-- leave blank if no second guest -->~~
	~~\|guest3 = <!-- leave blank if no third guest -->~~
	\|downloadLink = http://media.libsyn.com/media/skepticsguide/skepticast2013-03-16.mp3		\|downloadLink = http://media.libsyn.com/media/skepticsguide/skepticast2013-03-16.mp3
	~~\|notesLink = http://www.theskepticsguide.org/archive/podcastinfo.aspx?mid=1&pid=400~~
	\|forumLink = http://sguforums.com/index.php/topic,45352.0.html		\|forumLink = http://sguforums.com/index.php/topic,45352.0.html
	\|qowText = Our inner weighing of evidence is not a careful mathematical calculation resulting in a probabilistic estimate of truth, but more like a whirlpool blending of the objective and the personal. The result is a set of beliefs - both conscious and unconscious - that guide us in interpreting all the events of our lives.~~<!-- add quote of the week text-->~~		\|qowText = Our inner weighing of evidence is not a careful mathematical calculation resulting in a probabilistic estimate of truth, but more like a whirlpool blending of the objective and the personal. The result is a set of beliefs - both conscious and unconscious - that guide us in interpreting all the events of our lives.
	\|qowAuthor = ~~[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_Mlodinow~~ Leonard Mlodinow~~] <!-- add author and link -->~~		\|qowAuthor = {{w\|Leonard Mlodinow}}
	\|}}		\|}}

Banjopine at 21:42, 21 July 2013

2013-07-21T21:42:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:42, 21 July 2013
Line 392:		Line 392:
	* [http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/revenge-of-the-woo/ Revenge of the Woo]		* [http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/revenge-of-the-woo/ Revenge of the Woo]
	* [http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/another-acupuncture-meta-analysis-low-back-pain/ Another Acupuncture Meta-Analysis – Low Back Pain]		* [http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/another-acupuncture-meta-analysis-low-back-pain/ Another Acupuncture Meta-Analysis – Low Back Pain]
			{{transcribing
			\|transcriber = banjopine
			}}
	== Quicky With Bob <small>(44:14)</small> ==		== Quicky With Bob <small>(44:14)</small> ==
	* Astronomer discovers closest star system to our sun		* Astronomer discovers closest star system to our sun

Banjopine at 00:45, 27 June 2013

2013-06-27T00:45:20Z

@@ Line 263: / Line 263: @@
 === Duane Gish Dies <small>(18:46)</small>===
 * [http://ncse.com/news/2013/03/duane-t-gish-dies-0014753 Duane T. Gish dies]
-{{transcribing
-|transcriber = banjopine
+S:  Speaking of motivated reasoning, Jay, you're gonna tell us about Duane Gish.
-}}
 === Acupuncture Meta-Analysis <small>(26:04)</small>===
 * [http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/revenge-of-the-woo/ Revenge of the Woo]

Banjopine at 22:40, 25 June 2013

2013-06-25T22:40:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:40, 25 June 2013
Line 263:		Line 263:
	=== Duane Gish Dies <small>(18:46)</small>===		=== Duane Gish Dies <small>(18:46)</small>===
	* [http://ncse.com/news/2013/03/duane-t-gish-dies-0014753 Duane T. Gish dies]		* [http://ncse.com/news/2013/03/duane-t-gish-dies-0014753 Duane T. Gish dies]
			{{transcribing
			\|transcriber = banjopine
			}}
	=== Acupuncture Meta-Analysis <small>(26:04)</small>===		=== Acupuncture Meta-Analysis <small>(26:04)</small>===
	* [http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/revenge-of-the-woo/ Revenge of the Woo]		* [http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/revenge-of-the-woo/ Revenge of the Woo]