Mantis!: Raw transcript and timestamps for episode 202

2015-05-25T18:52:48Z

Raw transcript and timestamps for episode 202

Mantis!: Reserving episode for transcription

2015-02-22T16:04:17Z

Reserving episode for transcription

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:04, 22 February 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{transcribing all
			\|transcriber = Mantis!
			\|date = 2015-02-22
			}}

	{{Editing required		{{Editing required
	\|transcription = y		\|transcription = y

Rwh86: auto skel, show notes

2013-08-29T12:51:41Z

auto skel, show notes

New page

{{Editing required
|transcription = y

|time-stamps = y
|formatting = y
|links = y
|Today I Learned list = y
|categories = y
|segment redirects = y 
|}}
{{InfoBox
|episodeNum = 202
|episodeDate = June 3rd 2009 
|episodeIcon = File:Crystals.jpg 
|previous = 
|next = 
|rebecca = y 
|bob = y 
|jay = y 
|evan = y 
|perry = 
|guest1 = 
|guest2 = 
|guest3 = 
|downloadLink = http://media.libsyn.com/media/skepticsguide/skepticast2009-06-03.mp3
|forumLink =
|qowText = 'Some people try to tell me that science will never answer the big questions we have in life. To them I say: baloney! The real problem is your questions aren’t big enough.' 
|qowAuthor = {{w|Phil Plait}} 
|}}

== Introduction ==
''You're listening to the Skeptics' Guide to the Universe, your escape to reality.''
== News Items () ==

=== Newsweek vs Oprah () ===
* http://www.newsweek.com/id/200025

=== Volcanic Extinction () ===
* http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601124&sid=aLYx3ji.OiD0&refer=home

=== UFO News () ===
* http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/5435262/UFOs-above-Merseyside-linked-to-HMS-Daring-military-exercise.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/5434040/UFOs-spotted-in-Cambridgeshire.html http://macedoniaonline.eu/content/view/6868/56/

=== Texas Evolution Update () ===
* http://ncseweb.org/news/2009/06/antievolution-bills-die-texas-004818
== Questions and E-mails () ==

=== Question # 1 - Evangelical Skeptics () ===
<blockquote>Greetings Skeptics! I have listened to and enjoyed every podcast you have put out (except for the infamous Neal Adams interview, which I just can't bring myself to cue up...I think being a huge fan of his comics work is preventing me, or the fact that I generally don't find such raw confrontations entertaining) My question stems from a recent conversation I had with my girlfriend who generally considers herself to be a critical thinker although she does have her 'sacred cow' like almost everyone does...in her case she is a non-practicing pagan. We listen to several podcasts together, but when I ask her to listen to yours she refuses, her reason being that she feels 'you have a tendency to be just as 'evangelical' and at times 'close-minded' as the believers'. I can think of quite a few ways to defend you in response to that comment, but I think hearing from you directly might have a greater impact. Whether you respond via email or on the show I'll make sure she reads/hears your answer. Thanks for your time and keep up the quality work! Shane Nitzsche (pronounced NIT-chee)</blockquote>

=== Question # 2 - Begging the Question () ===
<blockquote>Okay. I give up. After all, with you guys as my role models (and in this case, Stephen) what choice do I have. I've been increasingly depressed at the way the term 'begging the question' has come, in mainstream media, to mean RAISING the question--and not what it always USED to mean. Now I have no problem with language evolving and meanings changing. However, 'begging the question' is such a valuable term for identifying a common logical fallacy--I seem always to be using it to harpoon some blubbering claim. And now? The term is becoming useless. And I know of no other to replace it. Circular argument is almost there, but, unless I'm mistaken, has a different emphasis. In fact, I was about to write to you lot looking for support, a crusade, a suggestion...something--when, what to my wondering ears should I hear.. but you, Stephen, using the term in the NEW, trendy, way, in the last podcast. Aaaarrrgh. I was hoping I could point out that, inconsistently, you have the term in your list of logical fallacies, but, alas, though it appears in virtually all such lists, it does not appear in yours. drat. So, I guess, I just give up. But that begs the question, 'What term do I use instead?' Theo Dombrowski Nanoose bay, British Columbia</blockquote>

== Interview with Simon Singh () ==
* http://www.simonsingh.net/
== Science or Fiction () ==
[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8081817.stm Item # 1]: Neil Armstrong recently confirmed that his famous “one small step for man” phrase was written for him by a NASA press secretary.
[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8077040.stm Item # 2]: Scientists have been able to track emperor penguin colonies in Antarctica from space by using satellites to spot their droppings.
[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8078477.stm Item # 3]: Researchers find that space headache is a real and distinct phenomenon and call for it to have its own classification.
== Who's That Noisy () ==
* Answer to last week: Brian Brushwood
== Quote of the Week () ==
<blockquote>'Some people try to tell me that science will never answer the big questions we have in life. To them I say: baloney! The real problem is your questions aren’t big enough.' - Phil Plait</blockquote>

{{Outro119}}
== References ==
<references/>

{{Navigation}}

SGU Episode 202 - Revision history

Mantis!: Raw transcript and timestamps for episode 202

Mantis!: Reserving episode for transcription

Rwh86: auto skel, show notes